Preface
Female Orchid Classification System
Welcome to the fantastic and totally captivating world of orchids – also known as pussy (aka), but more politely and accurately named human female genitalia. I’m orchiddoc, creator of the Female Orchid Classification System (FOCS, pronounced fox) and your personal guide to help you to classify and describe orchids.
Question: What makes me an orchid doctor?
Answer: Viewing many tens of thousands of pictures of pussy, a keen eye for morphology (form and relationship to structural detail), and a burning need to understand the variations in human female genitalia. For the skeptics amongst you, consider the observational genius of Charles Darwin to view thousands of species examples to develop evolutionary theory and publish “On The Origin of Species”. I’m too humble to compare myself in the same breath as Darwin, however the principle of discovery is the same – collection of a large number of examples, observation and hypothesis. This website comprises my hypothesis on the “Morphology of Human Female Genitalia” with the proof being in the form of photographic evidence and supporting rationale. How accurate my hypothesis is will depend on the number of examples that can be presented that contradict the hypothesis, in addition to the compelling arguments that force the revision of the original hypothesis.
Question: What is the Female Orchid Classification System?
Answer: It is a new method of classifying and describing orchids (aka pussy) that takes into account the diversity of human female genitalia.
Question: Why would anyone want to develop a system to classify and describe orchids?
Answer: Our current knowledge of most everything human has generally been classified and described except for human female genitalia. The knowledge we have of human genitalia relates to anatomical form and function, but does not let us describe the variations from woman to woman. One of the most important features of the female body is grossly under-studied as to comparative sameness, differences, unique features, size, shape and frequency of type. The Female Orchid Classification System is the first comprehensive attempt at providing a systematic method and vocabulary to describe the diverse features of these orchids.
Question: If it’s so important, why hasn’t anyone to date developed a method to do this?
Answer: In short, a lack of source material to analyze. Historically, the taboo against publishing explicit photos of female genitalia was broken by Larry Flynt and Hustler magazine starting in 1974 by publishing “pink shots” of the female vulva. Since that time, porn has become ubiquitous which has contributed to public viewing of female genitalia. However, by far the biggest contributor has been the development and evolution of high quality digital cameras and the world wide web. This has allowed professionals and amateurs to photograph female genitalia in exquisite detail, and publish the results. As well, the trend towards hairless pussy means digital images are largely clear and unencumbered. These are the reasons that we now have an abundance of source material i.e. high quality photos of female genitalia.
To the question of “why now”. I had hoped some women, or an individual woman, would have been fascinated enough with their own anatomy to develop a similar classification system. This has not happened and my survey of the subject indicates it was unlikely to happen for whatever reasons. As ironic as it seems for a man to develop a classification system for something uniquely female, the world hates a void and I couldn’t wait for others to do it. My belief is that if it wasn’t me developing a classification system, someone else surely would in time, but it might have been a very long time.
Question: So it’s nice you can classify orchids, but what use is it?
Answer: By classifying orchids (comparing, contrasting and describing), we can articulate the variation in human female genitalia. This serves many purposes, some of which are:
- From a social and psychological point of view, it further dispels the myth that women have abnormal genitalia
- Without orchid classification, how would anyone be able to determine a new or unique orchid type or feature?
- It sets the table for scientific inquiry. Are the orchids of the world mostly Type A or Type B etc. and what’s the percentage splits? What’s the most common type of orchid and what are the rare types? Could we empirically determine sameness / differences in orchids by measurement and statistical comparisons?
Question: What is the scope of the Female Orchid Classification System?
Answer: FOCS can be best described as to what it doesn’t include. All types of female orchids are included except for ambiguous genitalia (those persons born with genitalia that are somewhere in between male and female), hermaphroditic genitalia (both types of genitalia) and genitalia that have been surgically altered. It is hoped in future to expand FOCS to include ambiguous and hermaphroditic female genitalia.
Additionally, all races and/or ethnic origin of women’s orchids are included; however, it must be acknowledged that, on this website, the photographic evidence from dark skinned women is sparse due to the difficulty in photographing dark skin orchids to reveal differences in forms. This is not intentional but results from a much smaller amount of source photographic material.
A note on examples provided. For most of the features of the Female Orchid Classification System and Descriptions, one to several examples are provided. For the sake of brevity, the fewest number of pictures are shown to illustrate the principle. For most of the features discussed, tens to hundreds of examples were reviewed and only the best quality and most illustrative examples were chosen. Every feature and description provided on this website has a minimum of 3 examples to warrant inclusion in FOCS. In actual practice, most features and descriptions have 10 to 20 examples used to develop FOCS, but not included in this website for brevity purposes.